Time Out review: Re-teaming actorJack Lemmon, scriptwriter Iz Diamond and directorBilly Wildera
year after ‘Some Like It Hot’, this multi-Oscar winning comedy is
sharper in tone, tracing the compromises of a New York insurance drone
who pimps out his brownstone apartment for his married bosses’ illicit
affairs. The quintessential New York movie – with exquisite design byAlexandre Traunerand
shimmering black-and-white photography – it presented something of a
breakthrough in its portrayal of the war of the sexes, with a sour and
cynical view of the self-deception, loneliness and cruelty involved in
‘romantic’ liaisons. Directed by Wilder with attention to detail and
emotional reticence that belie its inherent darkness and melodramatic
core, it’s lifted considerably by the performances: the psychosomatic
ticks and tropes of nebbish Lemmon balanced by the pathos of Shirley MacLaine’s put-upon ‘lift girl’.
Here's
one of the great films set during Christmas, and an opportunity to see
Stanley Kubrick's much-underrated final movie in an original 35mm print. The film, part of the Christmas season at the cinema, is also being shown on December 7th and you can find all the details here.
Chicago Reader review: Initial
viewings of Stanley Kubrick's movies can be deceptive because his films
all tend to be emotionally convoluted in some way; one has to follow
them as if through a maze. A character that Kubrick might seem to treat
cruelly the first time around (e.g., Elisha Cook Jr.'s fall guy in The
Killing) can appear the object of tender compassion on a subsequent
viewing. The director's desire to avoid sentimentality at all costs
doesn't preclude feeling, as some critics have claimed, but it does
create ambiguity and a distanced relationship to the central characters.
Kubrick's final feature very skillfully portrays the dark side of
desire in a successful marriage; since the 60s he'd been thinking about
filming Arthur Schnitzler's brilliant novella "Traumnovelle," and
working with Frederic Raphael, he's adapted it faithfully--at least if
one allows for all the differences between Viennese Jews in the 20s and
New York WASPs in the 90s. Schnitzler's tale, about a young doctor
contemplating various forms of adultery and debauchery after discovering
that his wife has entertained comparable fantasies, has a somewhat
Kafkaesque ambiguity, wavering between dream and waking fantasy (hence
Kubrick's title), and all the actors do a fine job of traversing this
delicate territory. Yet the story has been altered to make the
successful doctor (Tom Cruise) more of a hypocrite and his wife
(powerfully played by Nicole Kidman) a little feistier; Kubrick's also
added a Zeus-like tycoon (played to perfection by Sydney Pollack) who
pretends to explain the plot shortly before the end but in fact only
summarizes the various mysteries, his cynicism and chilly access to
power revealing that Kubrick is more of a moralist than Schnitzler. To
accept the premises and experiences of this movie, you have to be open
to an expressionist version of New York with scant relation to the 90s
(apart from cellular phones and AIDS) and a complex reading of a
marriage that assumes the relations between men and women haven't
essentially changed in the past 70-odd years. This is a remarkably
gripping, suggestive, and inventive piece of storytelling that, like
Kubrick's other work, is likely to grow in mystery and intensity over
time. Jonathan Rosenbaum
The Cinema Museum report that the rights holders Python (Monty) Pictures wish to remind
film lovers that this ISN’T a quote-along screening and please not to
come in costume. Thank You. Chicago Reader review: Silly,
sophomoric, and slapped together—but would you want it any other way?
The Pythons' second feature (1975) is full of things that even the
relatively tolerant BBC wouldn't allow—including real violence, real
pestilence, real death, and other comic devices. TV's 30-minute format
may be better suited to the team's fragile conceits (the killer bunny
bit seems to go on forever), but for all the stretching the film never
snaps. Look sharp for the Ken Russell hommages. Terry Jones and Terry Gilliam directed. Dave Kehr Here (and above) is the trailer.
This 35mm screening is part of the Animus Magazine season devoted to Peter Weir. Details here. The Truman Show also screens on November 24th and 25th (with Elena Lazic introduction).
Time Out review: Truman
Burbank is beginning to wise up. People seem to listen to him, but they
never really connect; he feels trapped in a job he doesn't care about, a
marriage he doesn't believe in, and a small island community he's never
been able to leave. It's as if his life has been pre-programmed from
the start: as indeed it has, for Truman is the unwitting subject of
television's most audacious experiment, a real-life soap following one
man from birth to death. When Truman (Jim Carrey) appeals to a higher power,
he's actually addressing the show's omniscient creator/director,
Christof (Ed Harris). The best comedy sinceGroundhog Day-
better, even, than that - this is more than just a savvy and ingenious
satire on media saturation, it's a moving metaphysical fable. One movie
you can pronounce a modern classic with absolute confidence. Tom Charity
This is part of the 'Undone: Women of the Erotic Thriller' season at the Prince Charles Cinema (full details here). The curation was by Abby Spira and the movies are presented in partnership with the National
Film & Television School.
Time Out review: Theresa Russell (excellent) plays an undercover cop on the edge, burned
out and unable to sustain her relationship with men. Under assessment by
the police shrink after shooting a criminal, she is still moonlighting
as a decoy hooker, a role that feeds her desire to lose control.
Assistant DA Fahey, meanwhile, is looking for a second witness to secure
a watertight case against a drug kingpin. Russell is recruited to make a
fake drugs buy designed to force a low-life dealer into testifying, but
her cover is blown and things get very complicated. Although a
subsequent plot twist, linking Russell's dangerous impulsiveness to a
loose thread of Fahey's complex case, is a shade too convenient, Sondra Locke
directs with great assurance. The action is tough, the low-life
atmosphere authentic, and the relationship between Russell and Fahey
charged with tremulous eroticism. Stylish, exciting, and emotionally
satisfying. Nigel Floyd
This 35mm presentation (also screening on November 19th) is part of the Neo-Noir November season at the Prince Charles Cinema. Details here.
Chicago Reader review: Released in 1975, near the end of Arthur Penn's most productive period (which began in 1967 with Bonnie and Clyde),
this haunting psychological thriller ambitiously sets out to unpack
post-Watergate burnout in American life. Gene Hackman plays an LA
detective tracking a runaway teenager (Melanie Griffith in her screen
debut) to the Florida Keys while evading various problems of his own
involving his father and his wife. The labyrinthine mystery plot and
pessimistic mood suggest Raymond Chandler and Ross MacDonald, and like
them screenwriter Alan Sharp has more than conventional mystery
mechanics on his mind. One of Penn's best features; his direction of
actors is sensitive and purposeful throughout. With Jennifer Warren,
Susan Clark, Edward Binns, Harris Yulin, Kenneth Mars and James Woods. Jonathan Rosenabum
Chicago Reader review of Vertigo: 'One of the landmarks—not merely of the movies, but of 20th-century
art. Alfred Hitchcock's 1958 film extends the theme of Rear Window—the
relationship of creator and creation—into the realm of love and
sexuality, focusing on an isolated, inspired romantic (James Stewart)
who pursues the spirit of a woman (the powerfully carnal Kim Novak). The
film's dynamics of chase, capture, and escape parallel the artist's
struggle with his work; the enraptured gaze of the Stewart character
before the phantom he has created parallels the spectator's position in
front of the movie screen. The famous motif of the fall is presented in
horizontal rather than vertical space, so that it becomes not a satanic
fall from grace, but a modernist fall into the image, into the artwork—a
total absorption of the creator by his creation, which in the end is
shown as synonymous with death. But a thematic analysis can only scratch
the surface of this extraordinarily dense and commanding film, perhaps
the most intensely personal movie to emerge from the Hollywood cinema.' Dave Kehr
This presentation, as part of the Painted Skies season, includes an introduction by season curator Bruno Savill De Jong and a panel discussion afterwards with medievalist scholar Sarah
Salih, Immersive Art specialist Ed Cookson and LARP expert Vicky Hawley.
Painted Skies is a film season celebrating fake
backgrounds, spotlighting films with innovative set design that reminds
us of their artificiality. This season was curated by Bruno Savill De
Jong as part of the National Film and Television School (NFTS). Find
more info at their website for Painted Skies and follow them on Instagram (@paintedsky_films) and Twitter (@paintedskyfilm).
Chicago Reader review: Eric Rohmer’s least typical and least popular film also happens to be
his best: a wonderful version of Chretien de Troyes’ 12th-century epic
poem, set to music, about the adventures of an innocent knight.
Deliberately artificial in style and setting—the perspectives are as
flat as in medieval tapestries, the colors bright and vivid, the musical
deliveries strange and often comic—the film is as faithful to its
source as it can be, given the limited material available about the
period. Rohmer’s fidelity to the text compels him to include narrative
descriptions as well as dialogue in the sung passages. Absolutely
unique—a must for medievalists, as well as filmgoers looking for
something different. This film also features the acting debut of the
late and very talented Pascal Ogier. Jonathan Rosenbaum
This 35mm presentation is part of the Little White Lies at 100 season. Details here.
Little White Lies introduction: It remains a travesty that Todd Haynes’ 2014 melodrama Carol was snubbed by awards committees across the board, but that didn’t stop us celebrating it on the cover of our 62nd issue, with an amazing cover illustration of Rooney Mara by illustrator Timba Smits. In this masterful, heart-crushing work, Mara and Cate Blanchett play a pair of romantically idle women in '50s New York who meet cute in a department store and begin an intense affair. A gorgeous evocation of classic-era cinema, and the perfect pre-Christmas treat.With an intro by LWLies editor-at-large, Adam Woodward.
This is the first night in the exciting 'Last Movies' season at the ICA Cinema. Full details of all the screenings in the five-month long repertoire can be found here. Subsequent evenings include tributes to John Dillinger, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Kurt Cobain and the Heaven’s Gate religious group, with live guests including Chris Petit, Elena Gorfinkel and CM von Hausswolff.
Last Movies remaps the first century of cinema according to what a selection of its key cultural icons saw just before dying. Conceived and created by Stanley Schtinter to enable an audience ‘to see what those who see no longer saw last,’ the ICA hosts a five-month programme to coincide with the publication of his book of the same title, described by Alan Moore as ‘Profound and riveting . . . a remarkable achievement,’ and by Laura Mulvey as ‘deeply thought-provoking.’
According to Erika Balsom, Last Movies ‘abandons all those calcified criteria most frequently used to organise cinema programmes ... period, nation, genre, director, star, theme: nothing internal to these films motivates their inclusion, their ‘quality’ least of all ... Last Movies embraces chance.’
Balsom will be in conversation with Schtinter to launch the programme and publication tonight, the 60th anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s death. Kennedy tethered his image to that of James Bond’s; United Artists produced From Russia with Love due to the President’s affection for the book. This film will screen alongside a fifteen-minute fragment of War is Hell, the ‘lost’ movie that the President’s assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was in the cinema watching at the time of his arrest.
Chicago Reader review: For my money, From Russia With Love is still the best Bond, with a screwball plotline that keeps
the locales changing and the surprises coming—even when reason dictates
that the picture should be over. Lotte Lenya and Robert Shaw make a
creepy pair, and Daniela Bianchi embodies the essence of centerfold sex,
circa 1964. Dave Kehr
This is the latest film in the excellent new 'Restored' strand at BFI Southbank and will be introduced by Jason Wood, BFI Executive Director of Public Programmes and Audiences.
This presentation is part of the Neo-November noir season at the Prince Charles and also screens on Novemeber 20th. Full details here.
Chicago Reader review: After seeing the work print of his last Hollywood feature, Orson Welles
wrote a lengthy memo requesting several changes in editing and
sound—work that was carried out in 1998 by producer Rick Schmidlin and
editor Walter Murch with myself as consultant. About the original
95-minute 1958 release (superseded since the mid-70s by a 108-minute
preview version), Dave Kehr wrote, "Eternal damnation to the wretch at
Universal who printed the opening titles over the most brilliant
establishing shot in film history—a shot that establishes not only place
and main characters in its continuous movement over several city
blocks, but also the film's theme (crossing boundaries), spatial
metaphors, and peculiar bolero rhythm." These titles now appear at the
film's end—yielding a final running time of 111 minutes—and in the
opening shot Henry Mancini's music comes exclusively from speakers in
front of the nightclubs and from a car radio. Other changes involve
different sound and editing patterns and a few deletions, all of which
add up to a narrative that's easier to follow, but there's no new or
restored footage. To quote Kehr again, "Welles stars as the sheriff of a
corrupt border town who finds his nemesis in visiting Mexican narcotics
agent Charlton Heston; the witnesses to this weirdly gargantuan
struggle include Janet Leigh, Marlene Dietrich, Akim Tamiroff, and
Joseph Calleia, who holds the film's moral center with sublime
uncertainty." Jonathan Rosenbaum
Cinema Museum introduction for this 35mm screening:
Introduction by critic Kambole Campbell
Virtual Q&A afterwards with matte painter David Mattingly
Leaping out of Chester Gould’s 1930s cartoon strips, Dick Tracy (1990) is
a comic book adaptation unlike any other. Ace policeman Dick Tracy
(Warren Beatty) takes on mob boss Big Boy Caprice (Al Pacino) while
resisting femme fatale Breathless Mahoney (Madonna). Warren Beatty’s
bizarre passion project boasts extraordinary matte paintings and
prosthetics to create an incredible pop-art world on film captured by
Vittorio Storara’s cinematography. This stylishly unique Hollywood flick
is a stunning, primary coloured spectacle with a surprisingly sincere
love story within this righteously corny pulp-noir.
Painted Skies is a film season celebrating fake
backgrounds, spotlighting films with innovative set design that reminds
us of their artificiality. This season was curated by Bruno Savill De
Jong as part of the National Film and Television School (NFTS). Find
more info at their website for Painted Skies and follow them on Instagram (@paintedsky_films) and Twitter (@paintedskyfilm).
Time Out review: Set in the '30s, Warren Beatty's film
culls its villains - a gallery of
grotesques with names like Pruneface, Flattop and The Brow - from the
later '40s strips. As Tracy (Beatty) sets about foiling the plans of Big
Boy and The Blank to take over the city, Breathless Mahoney (Madonna)
introduces emotional conflict for the careerist detective, whose
long-standing relationship with Tess Trueheart (Glenne Headly) is going
nowhere
fast. Beatty has rejected 'psychology and behaviour' (read complexity)
in characterisation; this is old-fashioned, clearly defined morality,
with literally no shades of grey (the use of colour is wonderfully
imaginative and carefully modulated). Pleasing restraint is evident in
the way Beatty allows his character to be outshone by his adversaries.
As mobster Big Boy, a brash thug fond of misquoting Lincoln, Nietzsche
and Plato, Al Pacino is virtually unrecognisable and hugely enjoyable;
and Madonna gives confident renditions of the Stephen Sondheim
numbers. A spectacular movie whose technical achievements - notably the
sharp editing - will surely provide a gauge by which subsequent comic
strip films are judged. Colette Maude
Chicago Reader review: 'More conventional than Godard and more sentimental than Chabrol,
Francois Truffaut spearheaded the breakthrough of the French New Wave
with this highly autobiographical first feature (1959). Jean-Pierre
Leaud is the wide-eyed boy who flees his battling parents only to find
himself irrevocably alone. Distinguished by its intensity of feeling and
freewheeling use of the wide-screen frame, the film ranks among
Truffaut's best.' Dave Kehr
Movies Are Dead have chosen another great late-night movie with this Dario Argento classic.
Screen Slate review: Anthony Franciosa plays Peter Neal, an American mystery writer who
travels to Rome in promotion of his latest novel, but must confront the
influence his lurid fiction has when a black-gloved murderer begins
mutilating people. Genre film actor John Saxon (Enter the Dragon, Black Christmas) and frequent Dario Argento collaborator (and former spouse) Daria Nicolodi (Deep Red, Phenomena, Opera)
also star as Neal's agent and assistant who become embroiled in the
investigation — Nicolodi in particular gives an impressive performance
(with an even more impressive scream) that elevates an admittedly thin
role. Tenebrae is often regarded as a giallo comeback for the
filmmaker, a return to the subgenre he helped define, following his
foray into supernatural horror with Suspiria (1977) and Inferno (1980).
However, it is also a self-reflexive examination of his own career, and
the accusations of misogyny often directed at him. Argento was never
one to conceal his more perverse preoccupations; if there is an
opportunity to capture the strangling of a beautiful woman on screen, he
will not only take it but provide the grip of his own hand in front of
the camera. At the same time, the technical focus in Tenebrae —
from rather majestic (and now-infamous) crane shots to the general
construction of the plot itself (essentially a way to move from one
intricate and gorgeous murder set-piece to another) feels like an
acknowledgment of responsibility: like pulling back the curtain on the
machinations in place that not only punish women, but turn such
punishment into spectacle. Tenebrae is essential Argento: perhaps the auteur's clearest
articulation of his own psychological and stylistic obsessions, but
with a more critical eye. We long to see men who dehumanize and kill
women eventually fall on the sword themselves. In Argento's world those
glimmers of hope are there if you look: the impalement will just most
likely involve a stiletto. Stephanie Monahan
Chicago Reader review: If this 1984 film really cost $60 million, producer Dino
De Laurentiis must be the greatest patron of avant-garde cinema since
the Vicomte de Noailles financed Buñuel's L'Age d'Or. Director
David Lynch thoroughly (and perhaps inadvertently) subverts the
adolescent inanities of Frank Herbert's plot by letting the narrative
strangle itself in unnecessary complications, leaving the field clear to
imagery as disturbing as anything in Eraserhead. The problem is that the imagery—as Sadean as Pasolini's Salo—isn't
rooted in any story impulse, and so its power dissipates quickly. The
real venue for this film is either a grind house or the Whitney Museum;
its passage through the shopping malls of America was a
once-in-a-lifetime anomaly. Kyle MacLachlan is the pallid hero who
becomes a messiah to an oppressed desert tribe. Dave Kehr
This is a 16mm presentation from the fabulous Cine-Real team. Enjoyment guaranteed.
Chicago Reader review: The
1957 film that established Stanley Kubrick's reputation, adapted by
Kubrick, Calder Willingham, and Jim Thompson from Humphrey Cobb's novel
about French soldiers being tried for cowardice during World War I.
Corrosively antiwar in its treatment of the corruption and incompetence
of military commanders, it's far from pacifist in spirit, and Kirk
Douglas's strong and angry performance as the officer defending the
unjustly charged soldiers perfectly contains this contradiction. The
remaining cast is equally resourceful and interesting: Adolphe Menjou,
George Macready, Wayne Morris, Ralph Meeker, and the creepy Timothy
Carey, giving perhaps his best performance. Banned in France for 18
years, this masterpiece still packs a wallop, though nothing in it is as
simple as it may first appear; audiences are still arguing about the
final sequence, which has been characterized as everything from a
sentimental cop-out to the ultimate cynical twist. Jonathan Rosenbaum Here (and above) is the trailer.
This film, starring Ben Whishaw, is
part of the season curated by artist Gray Wielebinski who has an
exhibition currently at the ICA. You can find details of all the movies here.
ICA introduction:'Created by writer Huw Lemmey and artist Onyeka
Igwe, Ungentle (2020) investigates the historical
convergence of British espionage and homosexuality, probing themes of
secrecy, privacy, deception, and underground knowledge. One of the
film’s central locations is St. James’ Park, which lies opposite
the ICA and has historically served as both a cruising ground and
site of British military and imperial spectacle.' Gray
Wielebinski
This great Roberto Rossellini film is part of the 'Joanna Hogg: Influences' season at BFI Southbank. Full details here.
BFI introduction: This influential and devastating study of a marriage on the rocks
centres on Bergman and Sanders’ English couple holidaying in Italy. To
mark the publication of Jeremy Cooper’s recent novel Brian, this event
will bring together Cooper in conversation with filmmaker Ben Rivers as
they introduce Rossellini’s masterpiece, and discuss the novel and
cinephilia more broadly.
Chicago Reader review: 'Roberto Rossellini's finest fiction film and
unmistakably one of the great achievements of the art. Ingrid Bergman
and George Sanders play a long-married British couple grown restless and
uncommunicative. On a trip to Italy to dispose of a piece of property,
they find their boredom thrown into relief by the Mediterranean
landscape—its vitality (Naples) and its desolation (Pompeii). But
suddenly, in one of the moments that only Rossellini can film, something
lights inside them, and their love is renewed as a bond of the spirit. A
crucial work, truthful and mysterious.' Dave Kehr
Two
things fascinate me about this great film: firstly, no one mentions
that it could all be the feverish dream of one of the central
characters; see if you can spot the key moment I mean. Secondly, the
character of Lermontov, superbly played by Anton Walbrook, who is one of
Powell & Pressburger's greatest creations. Enjoy. Here are extracts featuring the aformentioned Lermontov.
Chicago Reader review: Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger's Trilby-based ballet film
(1948, 133 min.) has been the cult property of dance freaks for far too
long. A look beneath its lushly romantic surface reveals a dark, complex
sensibility, and that surface, rendered in the somber tones of British
Technicolor, reflects a fantastically rich cinematic inventiveness.
Moira Shearer is the ballerina who, following the outlines of a Hans
Christian Andersen tale, trades her life for her art; Anton Walbrook, as
her impresario, is perhaps the most forceful embodiment of the shaman
figures–magical, outsized, sinister–who haunt Powell and Pressburger's
work. The Red Shoes remains the best known of Powell and
Pressburger's 18 features, yet it's only the tip of the iceberg–beneath
it lies the most commanding body of work in the British cinema. Dave Kehr
Time Out review: Swap Beethoven for heroin, and Stanley Kubrick’s scandalous 1971
Moog-mare based on Anthony Burgess’s novel might work as a forerunner to
‘Trainspotting’. It presents the wayward travails of Little Alex
(Malcolm McDowell) a tearaway who likes nothing more than a bit of the
old ultra violence. But after a bungled break-in where he is abandoned
by his band of cock-nosed droogs, he is packed off to a hospital to be
‘cured’. The style of filmmaking is at once clinically precise and
imaginatively loose. This is down to the multitude of tricks that
Kubrick hoists in (slo-mo, fast-forward, cartoon inserts, back
projection) to encapsulate the total autonomy these characters have and
why they see their behaviour as thrilling. The violence is plentiful and
invites a mixture of revulsion and amusement, not least because it is
usually overlaid by Walter Carlos’s mad reinterpretations of classical
standards. Does it stand up psychologically? Probably not. But as an
example of a work in which the filmmaking style matches the tone of the
material, it’s peerless. David Jenkins
This is the first film in the 'Undone: Women of the Erotic Thriller' season at the Prince Charles Cinema (full details here). The curation was by Abby Spira and the movies are presented in partnership with the National
Film & Television School.
Season introduction:Sex
and danger. The linkage has always existed in Hollywood, but it
wasn’t until the late 80s and 90s that the association was made so
explicit with the boom of the erotic thriller. Often demeaned as
schlocky and exploitative, the genre highlighted societal fears and
anxieties about women and their sexuality. Unsurprisingly, most films
were directed by men, but across the decade, some select women could
get their version of the genre onto the big screen. This season
celebrates that. Over the course of four films, we will look at the
women behind and in front of the camera who used this genre to
explore both the fears of erotic desires of women. Let’s bring the
Prince Charles back to its roots and make it sexy again.
Chicago Reader review: The Wachowskis, who scripted Assassins, wrote and directed this
adroit and sexy 1996 crime thriller about the hot romance between a
gangster’s moll (Jennifer Tilly) and the ex-con who’s her neighbor (Gina
Gershon). Eventually they concoct an elaborate scam to rip off the
gangster (Joe Pantoliano)—a money launderer for the mob who temporarily
has a couple million dollars. (The laundering here involves literally
washing blood off bills.) This gets very suspenseful (as well as fairly
gruesome) in spots, and if it never adds up to anything profound, it’s
still a welcome change to have a lesbian couple as the chief
identification figures. Jonathan Rosenbaum
Chicago Reader: A story of damaged faith and rising sexual hysteria (1946) set among a
group of nuns in India who are working to convert a sultan's palace into
a convent. Films on this subject are generally solemn and naive, but
director Michael Powell and writer Emeric Pressburger bring wit and
intelligence to it—the title, for example, refers not to some campy
romantic theme but to a cheap men's cologne worn by the local
princeling. The film's lush, mountainous India, full of sensual
challenges and metaphorical chasms, was created entirely in the studio,
with the help of matte artist Peter Ellenshaw. Powell's equally
extravagant visual style transforms it into a landscape of the
mind—grand and terrible in its thorough abstraction. With Deborah Kerr,
David Farrar, Jean Simmons, and Sabu. Dave Kehr
This 35mm presentation also screens at the Prince Charles Cinema on November 12th and 27th. You can find all the details here.
Full review here: Blow Outis among Brian De Palma's very best films. It entertains a close relation
with a very strong (and better respected) American film of the '70s, Francis
Coppola's The Conversation (1974). Both these films are about the
art and the act of sound recording; both are about the uncovering of conspiracies.
Through The Conversation, De Palma reaches back to Michelangelo
Antonioni's famous (and somewhat overrated) Blow Up (1966), where
it was still photography that inadvertently uncovered a mystery. All three films trace
a sad arc of failure: the conspirators rise up and crush the would-be
everyday investigators, with their cameras and sound recording machines.
All are about the treachery of appearances, and the ease with which technological
evidence can be tampered with (photos can be falsified, audiotapes can
be erased), something which usually happens mysteriously, off-screen,
in the dead of night. Finally, all three films, from the '60s to the '80s
mark a certain kind of moral, or rather amoral mood. Their heroes, whether
played by David Hemmings (Blow Up), Gene Hackman (The Conversation)
or John Travolta (Blow Out), tend to have pretty soft, flabby,
moral senses to begin with – they're cool, indifferent, cruising, sometimes
repressing very effectively some past crisis or trauma. And although fate
spurs all three into some daring action, they eventually take the blows
of the world as some kind of sad, tragic or just matter-of-fact confirmation
that no ordinary person can effect or change anything in this dirty world
– so you may as well sink back into sloth, and keep drifting off to the
big sleep. Adrian Martin
Chicago Reader review: Retitled The Invaders and cut by 16 minutes for American release,
this 1941 film is a typically perverse and entertaining propaganda
piece by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger. The plot—a German U-boat
lands in Canada, and the crew must make it across the U.S. border
before they’re captured—forces the audience to identify with the enemy,
and the forces of freedom are represented by a series of oddballs and
misfits—including Laurence Olivier in an out-there performance as a
French-Canadian fur trapper and Leslie Howard as a poetry-reading
recluse who lays down his volume of Shelley to take on the intruders
single-handedly. Somehow, all this deliberate inversion and eccentricity
ends up being more stirring than most straight propaganda films—and
certainly a lot more imaginative and suspenseful. Dave Kehr
This is a 35mm presentation from the Badlands Collective.
Time Out review: Dealing with drugs, cops and corruption, this is Serpico all over
again, but revised, enlarged and immeasurably improved. All moral
certainties have gone, leaving instead a can of worms where questions of
friendship, loyalty and honesty are redefined in the ambiguous light of
corruption as a NY police officer (Treat Williams), inspired by an
indefinable mixture of reformist zeal, guilty self-loathing, and sheer
delight in the opportunity for headline exploits, turns informer on
behalf of the DA's commission of enquiry. An astonishing in-depth
portrait of the interlocking worlds of police and hoodlum results, with
no punches pulled and no easy solutions. Sidney Lumet isn't noted as the most
cinematic of directors; but here the intricate mosaic structure he
developed in Dog Day Afternoon generates a dynamism entirely its own, with the invisible mise en scène guaranteed by the galvanising interplay of New York locations and a brilliant ensemble cast. Tom Milne
Barbican introduction (for a previous screening): Susan Sontagwrote
that movie-going is an essential part of the experience we want from
film – the experience of surrendering to and being transported by what’s
on the screen. It’s not just a question of the size of the screen; to
be properly “kidnapped” in this way by a movie, she writes, “you have to
be in a movie theatre, seated in the dark among anonymous strangers.”
It’s never the same at home.Now
that there are so many other ways of watching films, the centrality of
movie-going to the movie experience is sadly much diminished. This
beautiful, mournful 2003 film, a kind of TaiwaneseLast Picture Show, is an affectionate tribute to the film medium, cinemas and the pleasures of cinema-going. Chicago Reader review: For all its minimalism, Tsai Ming-liang's 2003 masterpiece manages to be many things at once: a TaiwaneseLast Picture Show, a
failed heterosexual love story, a gay cruising saga, a melancholy tone
poem, a mordant comedy, a creepy ghost tale. A cavernous Taipei movie
palace on its last legs is (improbably) showing King Hu's groundbreaking
1966 hitDragon Innto
a sparse audience (which includes a couple of that film's stars) while a
rainstorm rages outside. As the martial-arts classic unfolds on the
screen, so do various elliptical intrigues in the theater—the limping
cashier, for instance, pines after the projectionist, even though she
never sees him. Tsai has a flair for skewed compositions and imparts
commanding presence to seemingly empty pockets of space and time. Jonathan Rosenbaum Here (and above) is the trailer.
Time Out review: Donald Cammell transforms a stalk'n'slash thriller into a complex, cubist
kaleidoscope of themes and images. Paul and Joan White (David Keith and
Cathy Moriarty) lead a happy enough life in a quiet Arizona mining town, until
Paul suddenly finds himself chief suspect in a police investigation of a
series of violently misogynistic murders. Matters are complicated by
the reappearance of Joan's gun-crazy ex-husband (Alan Rosenberg). A
determinedly offbeat murder mystery, delving into dotty Indian mysticism
and throwing up symbols, red herrings, and Steadicam flourishes for the
asking, this nevertheless remains oddly effective. Imbued with a
brooding, oppressive atmosphere and coloured by vivid performances,
though often murkily motivated, it is genuinely nightmarish in its
portrait of relationships where love is blinding and the past casts an
intolerably heavy spell.
Geoff Andrew
This 35mm presentation, introduced by BFI National Archive Curator Jo Botting, is part of the Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger season at BFI Southbank. BFI update: We are pleased to announce that this screening will be introduced by actor Jess Conrad.
Rather than reproduce a review here's an extract from the Brad Stevens column 'Bradlands' in the October 2012 issue of Sight and Sound. Stevens explains why: 'An especially memorable event scheduled by The Art House Cinema Meetup, involved a rare
screening of Michael Powell’s The Queen’s Guards (1961) at BFI
Southbank earlier this year. Although the film’s reputation could hardly
have been worse – Ian Christie, who introduced the screening, virtually
apologised for it – everyone I spoke to afterwards seemed pleasantly
surprised. Several members of the group who attended our post-screening
discussion were familiar with Peeping Tom, and noted how the
protagonists of both films were attempting to simultaneously imitate and
rebel against their obsessively traditional fathers, the central
character of The Queen’s Guards being depicted as a helpless puppet (via
the toy soldier possessed by his girlfriend) and a fly caught in a
spider’s web (his crippled father moves around the family home by
swinging from steel bars attached to the ceiling). One of our members, Yusef Sayed, continued this discussion in an
email he sent me, observing that “the emphasis on the Captain’s trolley
rail system cast an eerie comment on a person’s actions being determined
by external barriers and guidelines. As you said, the ascent of the
stairs was striking and almost spider-like. The central character, too,
was obviously troubled by the feeling that he needed to fulfil a role
and stick to a tradition, stay within set codes of conduct – leading to
the uncertain feelings about following in his brother’s footsteps… This,
of course, leads to the idea of being governed by tradition,
expectations, identified only by your role in society, whether a soldier
or a gentleman…”
I had noticed Kim Newman heading into the screening, and subsequently
posted a message on his Facebook wall, noting that The Queen’s Guards
had “reminded me of John Ford’s The Long Gray Line (1954), another
CinemaScope film in which the director’s admiration for military
institutions struggles with an awareness of the neuroticism of those
institutions”; to which Kim responded, “I thought of the same Ford film,
but also saw odd connections with that 80s cycle about being in
not-really-needed services (Top Gun, An Officer and a Gentleman,
Heartbreak Ridge)… The nicest touch was the hero not taking his
girlfriend’s job as a fashion model seriously since all she does is
dress up in silly clothes and pose, when it turns out that the highlight
of his military career is exactly like that.” These discussions were clearly far more carefully considered than the
‘official’ discourses on Powell’s film, demonstrating how cinephilia
has been enriched by technologies all too frequently imbricated with
superficiality.'